For months, a quiet but determined battle has been playing out between Rakesh Gupta, a member of Kendriya Bhandar, and one of India’s most prominent consumer cooperatives. At the heart of the conflict are demands for transparency on how society conducts its affairs, including the procurement and sale of Bharat Atta and Bharat Rice, staples that reach thousands of households.
Now, in what is being hailed as a landmark moment for cooperative governance, the Cooperative Ombudsman has ruled decisively in favor of Mr. Gupta. The order directs Kendriya Bhandar, officially known as the Central Government Employees Consumer Cooperative Society Ltd., to share the records Gupta has been seeking, and to do so within 15 days.
Gupta’s requests were anything but minor. They covered a broad spectrum of the society’s functioning: recruitment rules, senior-level appointments, vendor contracts, GST compliance, quality checks on organic pulses, vigilance proceedings, and the minutes of board meetings and audit reports. Together, these demands painted a picture of a member insisting on accountability in a cooperative that plays a vital role in public distribution.
Kendriya Bhandar, however, resisted at every step. It argued that its General Body had resolved not to entertain Gupta’s correspondence, citing confidentiality clauses, provisions of the IT (Amendment) Act, 2023, and even questioning Gupta’s intent and credentials. The society also pointed to pending clarifications from the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies and cited a Supreme Court judgment on privacy as reasons to withhold information.
The Ombudsman was not persuaded. In a strongly worded order, it reminded the society that General Body resolutions cannot override statutory rights guaranteed under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies (MSCS) Act, 2002. Section 108 of the Act, the Ombudsman emphasized, is clear: members are entitled to inspect books of account, records, and related documents.
Equally important was the Ombudsman’s reference to the Delhi High Court’s ruling, which had earlier restored Gupta’s membership and clarified that ongoing petitions do not limit his rights as a member. By invoking these precedents, the order effectively dismantled Kendriya Bhandar’s defenses.
The society must now provide Gupta with the requested information within 15 days and file a compliance report.
Ripple Effect Beyond Kendriya Bhandar
While this order secures transparency for one member, its impact is likely to resonate far more widely. Multi-state cooperatives across India, ranging from agriculture and housing to consumer supply chains, frequently face similar complaints of opacity, selective disclosure, and resistance to member scrutiny.
By affirming that internal resolutions or procedural excuses cannot curtail statutory rights, the Ombudsman’s decision sets a precedent that could compel other cooperatives, including those closely tied to public distribution and government-backed schemes, to open their books to members.
At a time when consumer trust hinges on the quality and pricing of essentials like Bharat Atta and Bharat Rice, this ruling signals that accountability is not an option; it is the foundation on which cooperative institutions must stand.
Leave a Reply